Reflexogenic Relationship: the Muscle Joint Battle Part 2
Erik Dalton, Ph.D.
Article as seen in Massage Today Magazine May 2006
Myoskeletal Muscle
Manipulation Through Joint Mobilization
A confounding situation arises as
the therapist's fingers attempt to pry between joint surfaces
to contact the short rotators, intertransversarii, and
intertransverse muscles. Although these tiny, one-joint
rotators/side-benders typically are the tightest in the
presence of joint dysfunction, application of direct localized
pressure sometimes is impossible, given the limited space
between articular surfaces. Here's when the myoskeletal
technique comes in handy. The therapist utilizes sustained
manual pressure on the superior fixated vertebra as the joint
is taken through a specific range of motion. Basically, bones
are used as levers to create a Golgi tendon organ (GTO)
release in all fourth-layer muscles, causing the
joint blockage. The question then arises as to the nature of
the fixated joint: Is it locked, open or closed? And which
side of the spine is stuck?
| Using the myoskeletal
approach, the therapist's fingers and thumbs wade through
the paraspinal laminar groove tissues, scanning for lumpy,
wiry and knotty transversospinalis muscles. Once the
hypertonic little muscles are found, what information is
revealed about the nature of the dysfunctional joint? Not
much! By Greenman's definition, it's obvious that joint
dysfunction exists, but what type? Is one side of the
joint jammed closed and unable to open during forward
bending, or is a superior facet not closing on the
vertebra below during backward bending?
Stuck Closed
In Figure 5, the therapist's
thumbs apply sustained pressure to the bony knot where the
fibrosis was found, as the side-lying client flexes and
extends the spine through the affected area using a
chin-tucking enhancer. If the bony knot pushes back into
the thumbs as flexion is introduced, the joint on the
ipsilateral side is not opening. The joint's axis of
rotation is forced to revolve around the fixated facets,
causing the superior transverse process to push back
against the therapist's thumbs. The thumbs hold a gentle,
sustained headward pressure on the superior transverse
process as the client flexes the chin toward his chest.
This produces a GTO release in the deep groove muscles and
stretches the fibrosed spinal ligaments and joint capsule,
allowing the fixated facets to open. In the myoskeletal
method, bones are only applied as levers to release
adhesive spinal soft tissues that cannot be liberated
directly with traditional deep-tissue techniques. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
During the
fourth-layer assessment, if the bony knot does
not push back into the palpating thumbs or
fingers as the client flexes through the area,
the joint is not closing on the
contralateral side. To free the hypertonic
tissues preventing closure of the superior
facets on their inferior neighbor, the client
assumes a prone position. The therapist's
fingers, thumbs or elbow slowly glide down each
side of the lamina groove as the client
rhythmically raises and lowers his head. In
Figure 6, the therapist uses the elbow to
traverse down the groove while the client
extends and lowers his neck and upper thoracic
spine. If a bony knot is palpated, the joint is
not closing on the contralateral side. Gentle,
sustained pressure (with client-enhancing
movement) releases fibrotic groove muscles,
joint capsules, and spinal ligaments, allowing
the superior facets joints to glide inferiorly
and close on the vertebra below. |
Scope of Practice
As with all treatment protocols,
exceptions occur that can render the myoskeletal method
ineffective. Damaged joints often create stubborn fixations
that cannot be released by working muscles alone. Vertebrae
that have undergone adherent cartilage degradation, apophyseal
joint swelling and facet "nipping" due to prolonged
microtrauma, typically will not regain lost motion simply by
releasing the fibrotic muscles, joint capsules and spinal
ligaments. True adhesive joint-fixation problems point to a
more serious condition. However, massage therapists who
regularly work in conjunction with chiropractors and
manipulative osteopaths can enhance therapeutic outcomes by
"prepping" the affected area, so that high-velocity thrusting
maneuvers are more effective. Manual therapists must develop a
good complementary health care referral base so prompt
referrals can occur if soft-tissue approaches do not alleviate
all the client's pain and/or posture problems.
Combining muscle and joint
modalities increases therapeutic efficiency and encourages
referrals as therapists resolve stubborn, long-standing
pain/spasm/pain cycles. By incorporating holistic-minded
reflexogenic routines, today's touch therapist can help solve
America's epidemic musculoskeletal pain crisis. Therapeutic
outcomes are enhanced as assessment and treatment routines are
expanded to include all soft tissues forming from the
mesoderm, including muscles, fascia, joint capsules, spinal
ligaments, nerve dura, and intervertebral discs.
Although myoskeletal therapy
delves deep into body structures, the intent is still slow and
sustained soft-tissue work combined with specific
client-initiated enhancers, such as chin-tucking, eye
movements, deep breathing, pelvic tilting, etc. The client's
experience following a myoskeletal session should be one of
invigoration, pain relief, increased range of motion and
postural improvement. Bones are assessed and treated as soft
tissues in the myoskeletal system, with pressure often applied
directly to myofascia overlying transverse processes. It's of
the utmost importance to stress that bones only are used as
levers to release hard-to-access, fourth-layer muscles,
ligaments and fibrotic joint capsules (much like frozen
shoulder work). Therapists always must remember that joints
should never be taken into a nonphysiologic range of motion,
which remains outside the scope of practice for most massage
and bodywork practitioners.
References
- Mennell, J MCM. Joint
Pain. Little Brown & Company, Boston, 1964.
- Greenman PE. Principles
of Manual Medicine, pg. 67. Lippincott, Williams &
Wilkins, 2003.
|